Burnout is rarely just about the individual, and we know this. It’s something that comes up in discussions all the time: how workload, leadership, priorities, and culture all play a role. Still, when you look at what organizations actually do, most of the focus ends up on the individual.
Resilience training, wellbeing apps, coaching, different ways of helping people manage stress better. None of these are wrong, and in many cases they are useful. But they don’t really touch the environment people are working in, and that’s where things start to feel a bit off.
Because if the way work is structured stays the same, there’s only so much impact these kinds of initiatives can have.
Part of the reason is practical. Individual-level solutions are easier to implement, easier to scale, and easier to measure. You can track participation, usage, outcomes. You can show that something is being done.
Changing the environment is different. It means looking at workload, at how priorities are set, at what is expected from teams and individuals. It often means making trade-offs, and accepting that not everything can move at the same pace. It’s slower, more complex, and not clearly owned by one person or function.
So it’s not surprising that the focus shifts towards what feels more manageable.
But if we keep focusing only on the individual, we end up mostly helping people cope with an environment that isn’t changing.
Burnout doesn’t really sit in one place. It’s not just about the individual, and it’s not just about the organization either. It sits somewhere in the interaction between the two.
And if that’s the case, then addressing burnout only from one side is always going to be incomplete.
***
I’ll be writing about work, burnout, and what actually drives wellbeing in real work environments. Welcome to Wellbeing that works.
No responses yet